hiddenharmonies.org Report : Visit Site

Technical data of the hiddenharmonies.org

Geo IP provides you such as latitude, longitude and ISP (Internet Service Provider) etc. informations. Our GeoIP service found where is host hiddenharmonies.org. Currently, hosted in United States and its service provider is Oak Point Partners Inc .

HTTP Header Analysis

HTTP Header information is a part of HTTP protocol that a user's browser sends to called Apache/2.4.18 (Ubuntu) containing the details of what the browser wants and will accept back from the web server.

DNS

HtmlToText

-- hidden harmonies china blog as china re-awakens, finding new harmonies in a brave new world… home about us faq terms of service resources recommended readings complete archives china charities «the national endowment for democracy» and china september 3rd, 2018 rolf no comments in 2017 the american government funded 48 anti-china groups and organizations through its «national endowment for democracy» (ned), – in order oppose and harm china and to create social and ethnic tensions and conflicts inside china. recently ned has been focusing on xinjiang, and as a consequence there has been negative reports about the situation there in many western newspapers and on global tv. here are some examples showing how ned is working and using its contacts, to harm china: one of their assets is marco rubio, republican senator for florida and leader of the «u.s. congressional-executive commission on china». on august 10, 2018 he writes on his website: «xinjiang today is ‘a police state to rival north korea, with a formalized racism on the order of south african apartheid,” wrote one expert. its residents make up only 1.5% of china’s population – but accounted for 21% of arrests in 2017. this massive increase over the previous year doesn’t include detainees in re-education centers.» https://www.rubio.senate.gov/public/index.cfm/press-releases?id=bcbc38ea-1748-4d40-aa04-9cc1ddc1a728 senator rubio also actively participates in meetings at the headquarters of the «national endowment for democracy» in washington dc, like at the «2017 award ceremony» – were he congratulated the ned-activists, it shows that he has close relations with ned: https://www.ned.org/sen-marco-rubio-r-fl-message-to-neds-2017-democracy-awardees-and. «radio free asia» (washington, d.c.) has also been focusing on xinjiang, like in this article from 3/8-2018: «advocacy group china human rights defenders (chrd) and a partner ngo, equal rights initiative, said friday that in the southern xuar alone some 660,000 rural residents of uyghur ethnicity may have been detained in the camps, while another up to 1.3 million may have been forced to attend mandatory day or evening re-education sessions in their villages or town centers.» https://www.rfa.org/english/news/uyghur/millions-08032018142025.html from this article one can see that «radio free asia» surprisingly is using a tiny and almost unknown organization, «chinese human rights defenders», as a reliable source on xinjiang. what is «chinese human rights defenders»? «chinese human rights defenders» consists of three persons: one «international director» renee xia (mandarin, english), +1 863 866 1012 (+1 is usa, and 863 is florida area code), and two researchers victor clemens (english), +1 628 400 7198 (628 is california area code) and frances eve (english), +852 6695 4083 (+852 is hong kong area code). (https://www.nchrd.org/contact/?tztc=1). at their website no no street address is given, but there is a post-box address in washington dc. since none of the three lives there, it’s highly likely that their post-box is looked after by the ned. «chinese human rights defenders» also writes at their website: «chrd operates a small emergency grants program which provides legal aid and emergency assistance to victims of human rights abuses.» (https://www.nchrd.org/about-chinese-human-rights-defenders) since such a small organization also is able to «empower grassroots activism in china», as they write – and to pay lawyers inside china, they need money. the list below shows that «chinese human rights defenders» in one year probably got $672,000 from the ned ($272,000 + $300,000 + $60,000 + $40,000), which in 2017 was around 4,5 million yuan – a huge sum of money in china. what is the ned? legal origin of ned is u.s. congress resolution h.r. 2915 (h.r. means house resolution). at wikipedia is written: «h.r. 2915 was adopted by the house on november 17, 1983 and the senate the following day» (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/national_endowment_for_democracy) the washington post wrote in 1991 the following about ned: «in 1991, allen weinstein, who helped draft the legislation establishing ned in 1983, candidly said: ‘a lot of what we do today was done covertly 25 years ago by the cia.’» (washington post, sept. 22, 1991). the list: here follows a list from https://www.ned.org of the 48 ned funded groups and organizations targeting china in 2017. it is highly likely that ned also trains them. (my additions and comments are written in parentheses): – advancing women’s rights: $60,000 – assistance for human rights defenders: $272,000 (probably money for «chinese human rights defenders», https://www.nchrd.org) – building advocacy capacity and empowering civil society to protect human rights: $412,300 – capacity building for human rights defenders: $300,000 (probably also for «chinese human rights defenders») – combating censorship and supporting free expression: china digital times, inc.:$340,000 (no street address is given, but china digital times is «supported by the berkeley counter-power lab». website: https://chinadigitaltimes.net) – defending and assisting rights defenders: $60,000 (probably also for «chinese human rights defenders») – defending journalists’ rights: $65,000 – democratic china electronic journal, democratic china, inc.: $180,000 (this is the same organization as late liu xiaobo and his wife liu xia had. for their connections with ned during the years 2005-2010 and their funding, see: https://blog.hiddenharmonies.org/2017/07/13/liu-xiaobo-rip-but-we-should-never-forget-the-14-million-yuan-from-ned) – empowering environmental rights activists: $110,570 – empowering workers: $75,000 – engaging critical analysis and political discourse: $140,000 – ensuring free and open access to online information: $200,100 – humanitarian assistance for human rights defenders: $40,000 (probably also for «chinese human rights defenders») – monitoring media freedom, freedom house: $85,000 – promoting democratic ideas and values: $150,000 – promoting democratic values, wei jingsheng foundation, inc.: $68,100 (wei’s group is based in washington dc, http://weijingsheng.org. in 1997 he also got the «national endowment for democracy award». the award is sum of money – and since 1989 it has also included a small-scale replica of the so called goddess of democracy) – providing information and analysis on china’s human rights, china change: $73,000. (washington dc, https://chinachange.org) – raising public awareness of civil society developments in china, center for international private enterprise (cipe): $215,643 (washington dc, https://www.cipe.org) – religious freedom, rights defense, and rule of law: $40,000 – strengthening civil society for policy and legal accountability: $172,000 – strengthening organizational and advocacy capacity for community-based organizations: $110,000 – strengthening the rule of law to protect human rights and public participation rule of law: $280,000 – strengthening worker rights and representation: $90,000 – supporting and empowering human rights lawyers: $238,000 (may be «china human rights lawyers concern group» based in hong kong, http://www.chrlawyers.hk/en) – supporting civic participation in public governance, center for international private enterprise (cipe): $234,160. (washington dc, https://www.cipe.org) – supporting free expression and open debate, princeton china initiative: $40,000 (princeton china initiative is connected with perry link, board member of «human rights in china» (new york). – supporting grassroots ngos: $90,000 – supporting labor rights: $63,500 – sustaining civil society in a repressive operating environment, international republican institute (iri): $600,000 (washington dc, https://www.iri.org) worker rights awareness, solidarity center (sc): $335,650 (washington dc, https://www.solidaritycenter.org) tibet: – a symposium for tibetan intellectuals and artists, filming for tibet: $60,000 (switzerland, http://www

URL analysis for hiddenharmonies.org

https://blog.hiddenharmonies.org/2014/11/
https://blog.hiddenharmonies.org/2013/06/
https://blog.hiddenharmonies.org/2016/02/
https://blog.hiddenharmonies.org/2014/01/
https://blog.hiddenharmonies.org/2016/07/
https://blog.hiddenharmonies.org/2011/04/
http://blog.hiddenharmonies.org/2012/01/debunking-myth-of-china-exploiting-africa-again/
https://blog.hiddenharmonies.org/china-charity-organizations/
https://blog.hiddenharmonies.org/2017/09/06/waist-deep-in-the-big-muddy/
https://blog.hiddenharmonies.org/2009/06/
https://blog.hiddenharmonies.org/tag/racism/
https://blog.hiddenharmonies.org/tag/china/
https://blog.hiddenharmonies.org/2012/07/
https://blog.hiddenharmonies.org/2017/09/13/abacus-small-enough-to-jail/#respond
https://blog.hiddenharmonies.org/2017/08/30/end-of-the-sino-indian-impasse-at-dong-lang-doklam-is-over-but-which-side-won/#more-22813
wired.co.uk
theregister.co.uk

Whois Information

Whois is a protocol that is access to registering information. You can reach when the website was registered, when it will be expire, what is contact details of the site with the following informations. In a nutshell, it includes these informations;

WHOIS LIMIT EXCEEDED - SEE WWW.PIR.ORG/WHOIS FOR DETAILS

  REFERRER http://www.pir.org/

  REGISTRAR Public Interest Registry

SERVERS

  SERVER org.whois-servers.net

  ARGS hiddenharmonies.org

  PORT 43

  TYPE domain

  REGISTERED unknown

DOMAIN

  NAME hiddenharmonies.org

NSERVER

  NS1.DNSOWL.COM 173.254.242.221

  NS2.DNSOWL.COM 168.235.75.52

  NS3.DNSOWL.COM 45.63.5.234

Mistakes

The following list shows you to spelling mistakes possible of the internet users for the website searched .